Part 3    Letters and Contributions


I. Physical and Chemical Behaviours of Karst Dynamic System


Dissolution kinetics of calcium carbonate minerals in
H2O-CO2 solutions in turbulent flow: the role of the diffusion boundary layer and the slow reaction

Liu Zaihua1, * and Wolfgang Dreybrodt2

1 Institute of Karst Geology, Guilin, China

2 Institute of Experimental Physics,University of Bremen, D-28334 Bremen, Germany

Abstract -- Dissolution and precipitation of calcium carbonate minerals in aqueous solutions with turbulent flow are controlled by a diffusion boundary layer (DBL) adjacent to the surface of the mineral, across which mass transfer is effected by molecular diffusion. To investigate the influence of such DBL to the dissolution rates of CaCO3 a rotating disk technique was used. This technique allows an exact adjustment of the thickness of the DBL by control of the rotating speed of a circular sample of CaCO3. Measurements of the dissolution rates in H2O-CO2-Ca2+-solutions in equilibrium with various partial pressures of CO2 from 1· 10-3 up to 1 atm showed a dependence of the rates R on the rotation frequency w , given by Rµ w n. The exponent n varies from 0.25 at low PCO2 to about 0.01 at a PCO2 of 1 atm. This reveals that the rates are not controlled by mass transport only, which would require n=0.5. The experimental data can be explained employing a theoretical model, which takes into account also the slow reaction and the chemical reactions at the surface (Dreybrodt and Buhmann, Chem. Geol. 91, 1991). Interpretation of the experimental data in view of this model reveales that conversion of CO2 plays an important role in the control of the rates. At high PCO2 and large thickness e >0.001cm of the DBL conversion of CO2 occurs mainly in the DBL and therefore becomes rate limiting. This is corroborated by the observation, that upon addition of the enzyme carbonic anhydrase, which catalyzes CO2 -conversion, the dissolution rates are enhanced by one order of magnitude. From our experimental observations we conclude that the theoretical model above enables one to predict dissolution rates with satisfactory precision. Since the precipitation rates are determined by the same mechanisms as dissolution, we infer that this model is also valid to predict precipitation rates. The predicted rates for both dissolution and precipitation can be approximated by a linear rate law R=a× (ceq-c), where Ceq is the equilibrium concentration with respect to calcite and a a rate constant, dependent on temperature, PCO2, DBL thickness e  and the thickness of the water sheet flowing on the mineral. Values of a are listed that can be used for a variety of geologically relevant conditions.

 

1. INTRODUCTION

Dissolution and precipitation of calcite in a CO2-H2O system play an important role in many geological processes, such as diagenesis of calcareous deep sea sediments (Berner, 1980; Boudreau and Canfield, 1993), the formation of karst in limestone terranes (Dreybrodt, 1988; Ford and Williams, 1989; White 1988), the evolution of water chemistry in calcite depositing stream systems (Hermann and Lorah, 1987; Dreybrodt et al, 1992; Liu et al., 1995) and the global cycle of CO2 (Archer and Maier-Reimer, 1994; Kempe, 1977). Both the precipitation and the dissolution rates in the system H2O-CO2-CaCO3 are controlled by three rate determining processes: 1) The kinetics at the mineral surface, which is given by the mechanistic rate equation (called PWP equation) proposed for dissolution by Plummer et al. (1978) which has later been verified also for precipitation (Busenberg and Plummer, 1986; Reddy et al., 1981; Inskeep and Bloom, 1985). This PWP-equation reads

F=k 1(H+)+k 2(H2CO3*)+k 3-k 4(Ca2+)(HCO3-)                     (1)

where the rate F is given in mmol cm-2s-1; and k 1, k 2, k 3 and k 4 are temperature dependent rate constants and the brackets denote activities in mmol cm-3 of the corresponding species at the surface of the mineral; 2.) The slow reaction exhibits significant influence to the rates, since stochiometry requires that for each calcium-ion released from the solid one CO2-molecule has to react to H+ + HCO3-. At large mineral surfaces and small volumes of the solution this slow reaction can be rate determining. Its kinetics has been reviewed by Kern (1960) and Usdowski (1982); 3) Mass transport of the reacting species away from and towards the mineral surface by molecular diffusion.

Taking into account these three processes Buhmann and Dreybrodt (1985 a,b, 1987) have put forward a model from which dissolution and precipitation rates can be calculated for a sheet of water of given thickness, covering the surface of the mineral. They have shown that due to CO2-conversion the rates depend on the thickness of this water sheet. The influence of mass transport is significant, when the water is stagnant or flows laminarly on the limestone. If, however, the motion of the water becomes turbulent, molecular diffusion is enhanced by turbulent eddies, such that under otherwise unchanged conditions the rates of dissolution or precipitation, respectively, can increase by almost one order of magnitude.

Thus the rates are also controlled to a significant extent by the hydrodynamic conditions under which dissolution or precipitation occurs. This has first been observed in the field. Deposition rates of calcite from water flowing turbulently across rimstone dams were found to be higher by a factor of up to 5 compared to those observed in the corresponding pools, with identical chemical composition, but almost stagnant water (Liu et al, 1995). Recently (Dreybrodt et al. 1996 a,b) it has been shown experimentally that the model of Buhmann and Dreybrodt is also valid for solutions contained in porous media of calcite both for dissolution and precipitation respectively, thus proving its basic assumptions. This model, however, is too crude to treat correctly the case of turbulence.

Therefore Dreybrodt and Buhmann (1991) have extended it by introducing a diffusion boundary layer separating the bulk of the solution from the surface of the mineral. Mass transport through this layer proceeds by molecular diffusion, whereas in the turbulent bulk complete mixing occurs within extremely short time spans. This model predicts rates, which depend on the thickness of the diffusion boundary layer. An experimental means to create such diffusion boundary layers of well defined thickness is the rotating disk technique (Levich, 1962, Pleskov and Filinovskii, 1976).In this paper we report on measurements of dissolution rates of marble and limestone for various thickness of the boundary layer under CO2 -pressures from 10-3 atm up to 1 atm. These experiments are in satisfactory agreement to the rates predicted by the diffusion boundary-layer (DBL) model, and a deeper understanding of dissolution- and also precipitation rates under turbulent flow in natural systems is thus provided.

 

2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

2.1. Materials

Marble disks were cored from marble slabs of 5 mm thickness. Their diameter was 3 cm. These samples were cemented into the holder of the rotating disk apparatus. This was then mounted to the shaft of the rotating disk equipment and polished during rotation by using progressively 400 (64m m), 800 (32m m), 1200 (21m m), 2400 (10m m) and finally 400 (6m m) grid size waterproof silicon carbid paper. This procedure assures a continuous surface of the disk including its rim. The surface of the marble sample in contact with the solution was 7 cm2. The marble was white and of coarse microcrystalline structure. It contained less than 1% Mg. To investigate the influence of the slow reaction carbonic anhydrase, an enzyme catalysing this reaction was introduced into the solution to concentrations of  0.1µmol  Bovine carbonic anyhdrase was purchased as lyophylized powder from Sigma and used as obtained.

Some experiments were carried out with limestone from Guilin, China. To obtain solutions in equilibrium with fixed CO2 partial pressures (PCO2) N2-CO2 gas mixtures with PCO2 =10-3, 5× 10-3, 10-2, 5× 10-2, 10-1 and 1 atm were bubbled through the solution.

2.2 Experimental Set-up

A schematic of the experimental apparatus is shown in Fig. 1. Runs were performed in a 1.2 litre glass beaker containing 1180 ml of preset solution, which was prepared by dissolution of calcite powder to the wanted concentration under the relevant CO2 partial pressure. The beaker was immersed in a constant temperature water bath capable of maintaining ± 0.5°C of the desired temperature. The reaction vessel was covered with Plexiglas lids with holes allowing insertion of the motorized shaft, electrodes, and a gas dispersion tube. Commercial N2-CO2 gas mixture with fixed PCO2 was bubbled through a metal dispersion tube into the reaction vessel, thus providing open system conditions with respect to CO2. The disk-shaped sample was held centred about 4 cm above the bottom of the reaction vessel on the end of a shaft. A motor drove the shaft, and gear reducers allowed the disk to rotate in the solution at speeds varying from 0 to 3500 rpm (rotations per minute). The rotating speed was held constant by a controller within 6%. The rotating disk was formed by use of epoxy from a mold into which the limestone disk and a screw was fitted, which served to fix the cast to the rotating shaft. Then using the rotating shaft as a lathe to which the cast was fixed, it was shaped into its final form, warranting that the whole set was free of asymetric centrifugal forces leading to disturbance of well defined hydrodynamic conditions. Polishing of the carbonate mineral was also performed at the rotating disk fixed to the rotating shaft of the apparatus.

Measurements of the dissolution rates were performed at a fixed rotating speed by measuring the increase in conductivity. In diluted solutions as they occur in our experiments conductivity and Ca2+ concentration are related linearly by

[Ca2+ ](mmol/l) =6.18× 10-3× cond.(m s / cm) - 1.38× 10-2. g =0.999

The record of a typical run with PCO2 =1× 10-3atm and initial [Ca2+ ]=3× 10-4 mol/l is shown by Fig. 2. The straight lines give the increase in concentration at differing rotating speeds from 100 rpm up to 3500 rpm. The rates were calculated from the slopes by

                                                (2)

where V is the volume of the solution and A the area of dissolving surface.

The thickness of the boundary diffusion layer (DBL) is given (Levich, 1962) by

                        (3)


Fig. 1: Schematic of the experimental set up: 1) controller for rotating speed, 2) motor and gear, 3) rotating shaft, 4) rotating disk, 5) computer for data acquisition, 6) conductometer, 7) conductivity cell, 8) thermometer, 9) temperature sensor for 10) thermostat, 11) H2O-CO2-Ca2+ solution, 12) CO2disperser, 13) CO2 + N2-supply, 14) supply tube, 15) water circulation from thermostat to waterbath cooling, 16) reactor vessel

Fig. 2: Ca2+-concentration versus time for a typical experiment. The straight lines show a linear increase of the concentration at constant rotating speeds. The numbers on the line denote rotating speeds listed in the inset. The corresponding dissolution rates are also given

 

where D is the coefficient of molecular diffusion (7.1× 10-6cm2s-1 at 20°C) and the kinematic viscosity of water. w is the angular velocity in S-1. In our set-up e =5× 10-3 cm at a rotating speed of 100 rpm, and at 3500 rpm e=8.5× 10-4 cm. In all experiments the Reynolds number Re = r2w/u

(r radius of sample) is below 2× 105, such that laminar flow can be assumed (Pleskov and Filinowskii, 1976).

To assure the accuracy of our set-up, we have performed dissolution experiments on gypsum. The sample was cut from a piece of a gypsum single crystal (Marienglas, Harz, Germany). In this case dissolution rates are entirely determined by molecular diffusion across the boundary layer (Opdyke et al., 1987)

                            (4)

Caeq2+ is the equilibrium concentration of gypsum (15.4 mmol/l at 20°C). Thus by measuring the dissolution rates at a given rotating speed, e   can be determined experimentally. Fig. 3 shows the result for four rotating speeds. The full line represents eqn. 3. From the good agreement between experiment and theory we conclude that the set-up works satisfactorily.


3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

The dissolution rates measured on the marble sample at 20°C for various partial pressures PCO2 as a function of w are illustrated by Fig. 4 in a double logarithmic plot. We have also performed experiments at a calcium concentration of 10-3 mol/l at PCO2 of 5× 10-3 atm. These data are also plotted in Fig. 4. For low PCO2 £ 0.01atm we find

R µ Wn             (5)

with exponents n between 0.13 and 0.25. For Pco2 ³ 0.05 atm the dissolution rates are independent on w . This behaviour shows clearly that dissolution of calcite is complex. If only mass transport by diffusion were rate limiting one would expect n=0.5 (cf. eqn. 3 and 4).

Dreybrodt and Buhmann (1991) in their diffusion boundary layer model (DBL-model) have suggested that the slow conversion of CO2 into H+ + HCO3- might be rate limiting, especially at thicker boundary layers. To investigate this experimentally we have performed dissolution experiments adding bovine carbonic anhydrase (BCA) with a concentration of 0.1 m mol to the solution. This enzyme catalyses CO2 -conversion thus increasing the reaction rate by about two orders of magnitude (Stryer, 1988). It has been successfully used by Dreybrodt et al. (1996 a, b) to show the rate limiting character of CO2 -conversion for dissolution and precipitation of calcite in porous media.

Fig. 5 represents the experimental results. It depicts the dissolution rates for various PCO2. The open squares represent the dissolution rates at a rotating speed of 100 rpm (e=5× 10-3cm) without BCA and the full squares show the corresponding rates with BCA added. Similarly the open (full) circles depict the rates for rotating speeds of 3000 rpm (e=9× 10-4cm) without and with BCA respectively. At low PCO2 there is no significant change on the rates upon addition of BCA. For PCO2 >0.01atm a significant enhancement of the rates occurs, when BCA is added. Measurements were performed at 10°C and 30°C. Table 1 lists the enhancement factors, i.e. the ratios of the rates with and without BCA under otherwise identical conditions for these two temperatures and for various PCO2. Below PCO2 =5× 10-3 atm BCA has no influence on the rates.

Fig. 3: DBL-thickness e plotted versus w -1/ 2. The straight line gives the theoretical values of e by use of eqn. 3. The points mark the experimental values using a sample of gypsum and employing eqn. 4.

Fig. 4: Log of the experimental dissolution rates for various PCO2 (listed by the symbols on the curve and by the first row in the inset) as function of the log of the rotating speed in rpm. All curves exhibit straight lines. Therefore a relation Rµ Wn is valid. The corresponding values of n are listed in the second row in the inset. Open symbols refer to a calcium concentration of 3x10-4 mol/l, closed symbols to a concentration of 1x10-3 mol/l respectively.

Fig. 5: Dissolution rate versus PCO2 for rotating speeds at 100 rpm (squares) and 3000 rpm (circles). The open symbols represent the rates in the solution without BCA, the full symbols those with addition of BCA (0.1m M).

Fig. 6: The geometry of the DBL-model: The DBL extends from Z =0 to Z = e . The well mixed core extends from Z =0 to Z = - d . The arrows denote fluxes of CO32-, HCO3-, and Ca2+from the mineral surface. Note that F is given by the PWP-eqn. (eqn. 1) employing the activities of the species at Z = e .

Table 1. Factors of BCA   enhancement of calcite dissolution rates at differing Pco2 and rotating speeds ( 10 and 30 )

The factors are 1 for both temperatures. But at 1 atm enhancement factors are about 10. Enhancement at the higher temperature is lower than at 10°C. These results show that some change in the dissolution of calcite occurs at high PCO2. Therefore one has to be cautious to conclude from such experiments to dissolution processes in nature, which usually occur at low PCO2 < 5× 10-3atm.

 

4. INTERPRETATION OF THE EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

The most comprehensive model of calcite dissolution and precipitation, taking into account the existence of a DBL is that of Dreybrodt and Buhmann (1991). A short description of its basic assumptions is given here, as we will use this model to interpret the experimental data.

Fig. 6 shows the DBL of thickness e , separating the calcite surface from the turbulent bulk of thickness d . In the region of the bulk complete mixing is assumed, such that no concentration gradients can build up. This can be modelled by assuming the turbulent diffusion coefficient Dt to be higher by a factor of 106 than the coefficient of molecular diffusion, which describes mass transfer in the DBL. The flux F of Ca2+ is given by the PWP-equation(eqn. 1) using the activities of the species at the surface of the solid phase. For stochiometrical reasons this flux must be equal to the total amount of CO2 converted to H+ + HCO3- in a column with area of 1cm2 covering the region from -d £ Z £ e . This is given by

                             (6)

RCO2 is the change of the CO2-concentration in time, resulting from two elementary reactions, occurring simultaneously.

The rate constants of these reactions are well known (Kern, 1960; Usdowski, 1982).

Using these boundary conditions the equations of mass transport can be solved numerically (Dreybrodt and Buhmann, 1991). For general information on chemical reactions in DBL the reader is referred to the textbook of Beek and Mutzall (1975).

In the following we give results, which have been obtained employing this programme. In a first step we have calculated the dissolution rates for the experiments as depicted in Fig. 4. The DBL thickness e was obtained from eqn. 3. For the experimental conditions with an area of the disk of 7cm2 and a total volume of the solution of 1180 cm2 the thickness d of the turbulent core is 167 cm. Fig. 7 depicts as full lines the theoretical dissolution rates as a function of e for the various CO2 partial pressures as used in the experiment. The data points represent the experimental data from Fig. 4; but these were divided by a factor of two to fit to the theoretical curves consistently. The reason for this behaviour is not very clear. One reason may be that owing to the roughness of the surface in the order of 10-4 cm the effective surface for dissolution is higher than the geometrical one. Another reason could be the variability of the PWP-rate constants with varying natural material. An increase of these constants by a factor of two raises the dissolution rates by the same factor (Dreybrodt and Buhmann, 1991). Rate constants of this magnitude have been observed by Compton and Daly (1984). Compton et al, (1985) have shown that surface roughness exerts significant influence to the rate constant k 3. They have measured this constant for samples of iceland spar polished with various grid sizes. They find k 3 = 2× 10-10 mol cm-2s-1 for grit sizes of 4m as we have used, twice as large as the PWP-value. Schott et al. (1989) have reported that the dissolution rates on strained calcite are higher by about a factor of two in comparison to unstrained samples. Considering this, division of the the experimental data by two is feasible, to render them comparable to the predictions of the DBL-model using the rate constants of PWP. Fig. 7 gives evidence that the experimental data and the model predictions are in satisfactory agreement. The model also shows clearly that the rates depend on e only if the PCO2 pressure is low, whereas almost no dependence on e is predicted for Pco2 ³ 0.05 atm and at e > 5× 10-4cm.

Fig. 7 Dissolution rates versus the DBL-thickness e for various PCO2. The symbols represent the experimental points from fig. 4 divided by two (see text). The full lines are obtained from the DBL-theory. The numbers on these curves denote the PCO2 values used for their calculation.

Fig. 8: Profiles of PCO2 , [H+], [CO32-]and [HCO3-] across the diffusion boundary layer for e = 0.005cm, when PCO2 = 1× 10-3 atm. Fca2+ = 3.7× 10-8 mmol cm-2s-1

To elicudate this behaviour we use the theoretical DBL-model to calculate the concentration profiles in the boundary layer. Fig. 8 illustrates these profiles of H+, HCO3-, CO32-, and PCO2 across the boundary layer for PCO2 = 1× 10-3atm and e =5× 10-3cm. The boundary to the bulk is at the left hand side at Z = 0. The units for the different species are denoted at the corresponding ordinates. From the profiles one reads that H+ and CO2 migrate from the bulk towards the solid phase on the right hand side whereas CO32- and HCO3- diffuse towards the bulk. The fluxes of these species are given by the first law of Fick as

                                     (7)

where C is the concentration of the corresponding species. Therefore the fluxes can be read from the slopes of the profiles. Spatial changes of the slopes must be interpreted as changes of fluxes, which are accompanied by chemical reactions into which the corresponding species is involved.

At the calcite surface (Z = 5× 10-3cm) due to the dissolution process there is a flux of HCO3- and CO32- towards the bulk. In order to keep the saturation index with respect to calcite sufficiently low, CO32-must react with H+ to form HCO3-. Due to mass transport by diffusion towards the bulk the flux of HCO3- (given by the slope of the profile) increases slightly for two reasons: Firstly CO32--ions react with H+-ions diffusing from the bulk into the DBL and secondly close to the solid phase boundary CO2 migrating from the bulk reacts to H+, which is then consumed by the reaction with CO32-. Nevertheless, there is still a considerable flux of CO32- into the bulk, such that most of CO32- released from the solid reacts to HCO3- in the bulk. Therefore most of the conversion of CO2 must also be effective there.

This, however, can no longer be valid, when the thickness of the boundary layer exceeds some critical value. If the DBL is sufficiently large the time for the species to migrate across the layer becomes so long that the chemical reactions will take place in the layer. We have therefore calculated separately the total amount of CO2 converted in the bulk and in the DBL for various e. This is shown by Fig. 9. At a critical thickness e » 10-2 cm the conversion rate in the layer equals that in the bulk. For smaller e the rate in the bulk by far exceeds that in the DBL. This explains, why there is a variation of the dissolution rates, with decreasing e : The rate of CO2-conversion in the bulk is given by

                                    (8)
If d is sufficiently large only small deviations of [CO2] from equilibrium are necessary to meet the condition FCO2 = FCa. Therefore CO2-conversion is not rate limiting. Molecular diffusion across the layer, however, still plays an important part and therefore the rates depend on e . This also explains the fact, why adding carbonic anyhdrase to the solution does not enhance the rates, as shown in Fig. 5.

 

Fig. 9: Calcite dissolution rate (dashed curve) and CO2 conversion rates in the bulk (· ) and in the layer (block.gif (816 bytes)) as a function of e . PCO2 = 1× 10-3 atm.

Fig. 10: Profiles of PCO2 , [H+], [CO32-] and [HCO3-] across the diffusion boundary layer for e = 0.005 cm, when PCO2 = 0.1 atm. Fca2+ = 9.2× 10-8 mmol cm-2s-1

We call dissolution under such hydro-chemical conditions bulk controlled. In contrast to bulk controlled dissolution at low PCO2 the situation is quite different for high PCO2. Fig. 10 provides the concentration profiles for PCO2 = 0.1atm for e =5× 10-3cm and otherwise unchanged conditions.

Note there is a steep decrease of the CO32- -concentration, within 5× 10-4 cm, which is mirrored by a steep decrease of H+ due to the reaction into HCO3-. The concentration of HCO3- shows a dramatic increase of its flux towards the bulk in this region. The carbonate-ions migrating towards the bulk react with the H+-ions diffusing towards the calcite surface and therefore the amounts of both fluxes must decrease. This is clearly seen by the slopes in the narrow region of 5× 10-4 cm adjacent to the solid. Close to this region there is a steep increase in the flux of H+ towards the solid, which results from conversion of CO2 diffusing from the bulk towards the surface of the calcite. The flux of H+-ions entering from the bulk is by far lower than the flux in the region of CO2-conversion, as can be judged from the slopes. This supply of H+ is caused by CO2-conversion in this region. Outside this reaction region the concentration of carbonate is practically zero, such that no carbonate is transferred into the bulk. HCO3-shows a constant flux towards the bulk. Fig. 11 shows the CO2-conversion rates in the bulk and in the layer for PCO2 = 0.1 atm as a function of e . In contrast to Fig. 9 the critical value of e =10-3 cm is one order of magnitude less. For smaller e  the reaction is bulk controlled. For e> 1× 10-3cm the conversion of CO2 occurs solely in the layer. Therefore conversion of CO2 is rate limiting and the dissolution rates become independent on e .

In this case addition of carbonic anyhdrase is effective in catalysis of CO2-conversion and the calcite dissolution rates increase upon addition of this enzyme, as depicted in Fig. 5 for rotating speeds of 100 rpm (e =5× 10-3cm) and also for 3000 rpm (e » 1× 10-3 cm). The decrease of the CA enhancement factors from 10°C to 30°C (cf. table 1) can also be understood. The CO2-conversion rate constants increase with temperature (Usdowski, 1982). Therefore at higher temperature the effect of CA is smaller than at low temperature and correspondingly the enhancement of calcite dissolution rates is also lower.

Summarizing, we have found that in the presence of a diffusion boundary layer two limits exist: At low PCO2 (<10-2atm) and e < 5× 10-3cm most of the carbonate ions can diffuse across the DBL and react there to HCO3-, whereby the H+-ions necessary for this, are supplied by CO2-conversion in the bulk. In this case of bulk control this reaction is not rate limiting and a complex interplay of the surface controlled reaction (PWP-rate-equation) and diffusion is at work.

For high PCO2 ( >0.01 atm) CO2-conversion takes place in a narrow region close to the solid.

This reaction becomes rate limiting even for such low values of the thickness of the layer as 10-3 cm. The good agreement of the predictions of the model with the experimentally observed data gives confidence that reliable estimations, at least with an accuracy ±25% can be made.

Fig. 11: Calcite dissolution rate (dashed curve) and CO2conversion rates in the bulk (· ) and in the layer (block.gif (816 bytes)) as a function of e. PCO2 = 0.1 atm.

Table 2. Numerical values of a =a ( T, Pco2, e , d ) for calcite dissolution in the open system.

 

 

5. APPLICATION OF THE RESULTS

The theoretical model of Buhmann and Dreybrodt (1985 a, b) has been tested experimentally and has been found to provide reliable predictions (Baumann et al, 1985, Dreybrodt et al. 1996 a,b) in the case of stagnant or laminarly flowing solutions for both dissolution and precipitation rates. In this work we have shown that the DBL model correctly describes dissolution rates for turbulent flow. In view of the results above and the fact that both dissolution and precipitation are determined by the same physical and chemical mechanism we suggest that the predictions of this model are also valid for precipitation. First applications in the interpretation of precipitation rates in natural stream systems (Dreybrodt et al, 1992, Liu et al, 1995) have yielded good results.

Furthermore growth rates of stalagmites in cave environments are in reasonable agreement to predictions from our models (Dreybrodt, 1988, Baker and Smart, 1995).

We therefore feel encouraged to list results obtained from the DBL-model for dissolution and precipitation rates for various natural occurring conditions. These can be used to give at least a first estimation, when applied to geological problems. Fig. 12 illustrates dissolution rates (a) and precipitation rates (b) for PCO2 = 1× 10-3atm for various thickness of e . The thickness d of the turbulent bulk is d =1 cm. For large values of e >0.005 cm rates are drastically reduced, compared to the utmost curve, which gives the maximal rates from the PWP-equation using the bulk activities of the species (e = 0). There is a significant increase in the rates for 5× 10-3cm £ e£ 1× 10-3 cm. Little influence of the DBL occurs, when e <2× 10-4 cm.

All the rate curves to a reasonable extent of accuracy can be approximated by a linear relation.

R = a × (ceq - c )                             (9)

a is a rate constant in cm s-1 and ceq is the thermodynamic equilibrium. It should be noted that close to equilibrium for both dissolution and precipitation, inhibition mechanisms are operative (Dreybrodt, 1988; Svensson and Dreybrodt, 1992; Dreybrodt et al., 1996 a,b). Therefore eqn. 9 is valid only for concentrations c/ceq £ 0.9 for dissolution and c/ceq ³ 1.2 for precipitation, respectively.

Furthermore due to CO2 -conversion in the bulk controlled regime the thickness d of the turbulent bulk can also exert significant influence onto the rates. This is illustrated in Fig. 13, where both dissolution (a) and precipitation rates are shown for various values of d depicted on the curves. For dissolution the rates are sensitive to values of d below 1 cm. There is little change for higher values. In contrast the precipitation rates show a different behaviour. Here the limiting value of d , above which the rates stay unchanged with increasing d , is higher by a factor of 10 (d =10 cm).

To summarize such data, Table 2 lists the values of a and ceq for dissolution rates with various PCO2, temperatures, e , and d . Table 3 gives corresponding data for precipitation. These can serve as a help to estimate rates in natural systems to a sufficient accuracy. It should be noted here that the values in table 3 are only valid for calcium concentrations [Ca2+] £ 5× 10-3 mol/l. For higher concentrations the real rates are underestimated by up to a factor of two.

6. CONCLUSION

We have measured by use of the rotating disk technique dissolution rates of calcite as they occur in natural waters of low PCO2; but also for high PCO2 > 10-2atm up to 1 atm, which are not likely to occur in nature. The aim of these experiments was to reveal the role of the laminar diffusion boundary layer which separates the surface of the dissolving mineral from the well mixed bulk of the solution. Our results give clear evidence, that the diffusion boundary layer across which mass transport must be effected by molecular diffusion can reduce the rates significantly. Furthermore, the slow reaction plays a significant role, which so far has not been sufficiently regarded in most problems dealing with dissolution or precipitation of calcite by many researchers in this field. We have found two regions, where this reaction plays a dominant role. For PCO2 < 10-2 atm and thicknesses of the boundary layer below 10-2 cm the carbonate ions released from the solid migrate across the boundary layer into the turbulent layer, where they react to HCO3- consuming the protons delivered by hydration of CO2. In this bulk controlled regime the influence of CO2 -conversion becomes evident by the dependence of the rates on the thickness of the bulk layer.

For large PCO2 > 0.01 atm and thickness of the DBL above 10-3 cm CO2 -conversion takes place in a small region adjacent to the calcite surface and almost all carbonate ions released from the solid react to HCO3- in this narrow region. The protons needed for this reaction are delivered by CO2 molecules, diffusing from the bulk and reacting to H+ + HCO3-close to the solid surface. In this case of layer control the rates are little dependent on the thickness of the turbulent zone, since CO2-conversion in the DBL is rate limiting. This is corroborated by the enhancement of dissolution rates upon addition of carbonic anhydrase.

This has some important consequences. Many dissolution experiments using the rotating disk technique have employed a partial pressure PCO2 = 1 atm and thicknesses of the DBL between 10-3 up 1× 10-2 cm (Herman, 1982; Herman and White, 1985). In this case rates are determined entirely by CO2 -conversion and no valid conclusion can be drawn on the dissolution mechanisms at the surface of the mineral. This is in agreement with the observation that the dissolution rates on calcite measured by Herman (1982) compared well to the predictions of our model (Dreybrodt and Buhmann, 1991). If CO2 -conversion controls the rates then one would expect no influence of the lithology of the limestone sample to the rates. Consequently we have measured rates with otherwise unchanged conditions for marble, for two limestone samples of Devonian origin from Guilin and a single crystal of calcite. Within the limits of error all samples exhibited identical rates. Similar results had been also obtained by Buhmann and Dreybrodt (1985 a) who showed that

during dissolution from thin stagnant films with thickness below 0.1 cm the dissolution rates are controlled by CO2 -conversion and mass transport. Consequently different minerals (marble, limestone, and a calcite singe crystal) exhibited identical behaviour.

Fig. 12: Theoretical dissolution rates (a) and precipitation rates (b) for an open system at PCO2 = 1× 10-3 atm for various values e of the DBL, denoted on the curves by numbers. The corresponding e is listed in the inset.

Fig. 13: Theoretical dissolution rates (a) and precipitation rates (b) for various values d of the turbulent core (cf. Fig. 6). The values of d are related to the numbers on the curve by the corresponding insets. e = 5× 10-3cm.

Table 3. Numerical values of a =a ( T, Pco2, e , d ) for calcite precipitation in the open system.

Often the rate equation of PWP is applied to explain field observations, by employing the activities of the corresponding species measured in the bulk water. Thus one neglects the presence of the diffusion layer and considerable overestimations of the rates are the consequence. (Liu et al, 1995). A nice example of the influence of the hydrodynamic conditions on dissolution rates in phreatic limestone caves has been given by Lauritzen (1986). He has shown that the dissolution rates in a cave consisting of a single phreatic conduit increased with increasing flow of water. At high yields of 10 m3s-1the rates were higher by about one order of magnitude, compared to those at yields of about 1 m3s-1.

It is of course not easy to give values for e in rivers or caves. Some estimations can be made by measuring dissolution rates on gypsum samples, which have suitable shapes to fit into the geometry of the limestone surface (Opdyke et al., 1987; and Dreybrodt et al., 1992). Even if this is not possible, the values of the kinetic constants can be used to give some crude estimation of the rates, which are based on a sound understanding of calcite dissolution and precipitation in such complex systems.

 

Acknowledgement ¾ One of us, Liu Zaihua, thanks the University of Bremen, the National Nature Science Foundations of China, and the "Stiftung Constantia von 1823, Bremen" for financial support.


Comments and suggestions to Webmaster,
Copyrights by Karst Dynamics Laboratory and Network Center of Guangxi Normal University,
1995-1999. All rights reserved.